[This post and the one following will be a simple overview of the details of three interpretations* of 9/11 which disagree in some way with the official government narrative. I will mention several issues which have caused suspicion and questioning, but I do not intend, nor have the time, to provide a great amount of detail or much evidence for claims or theories. I will include links to outside sources when it is possible for anyone who is interested in reading more about the theories and claims to determine for themselves to what extent they may be plausible. By no means should anything written here be accepted at face value or as hard fact. My primary goal in presenting the reasons for different 9/11 theories is to simply create awareness of most of the important questions surrounding 9/11 to promote critical thinking and a closer examination.]
*see part 1 of this post to review the four interpretations of 9/11 listed.

Motives

The main connecting question regarding all three of the alternative 9/11 interpretations I have presented is the question of motive. Whether one thinks the government was responsible for 9/11 or just merely exploited the attacks for political gain, the questions of why anyone could actually do such shameful things or take such a great risk are likely to be among the first asked…

(more…)