<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Silent Speaking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://silentspeaking.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://silentspeaking.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on life, history, politics and society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:00:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Medi(s)care by Business Plan</title>
		<link>http://silentspeaking.wordpress.com/2009/09/03/mediscare/#comment-1249</link>
		<dc:creator>Business Plan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silentspeaking.wordpress.com/?p=1419#comment-1249</guid>
		<description>I like your post... thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your post&#8230; thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Read Without Reading by doctorblue</title>
		<link>http://silentspeaking.wordpress.com/2009/08/24/how-to-read-without-reading/#comment-1246</link>
		<dc:creator>doctorblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silentspeaking.wordpress.com/?p=1371#comment-1246</guid>
		<description>Very insightful. I watched the interview on The Daily Show and found myself feeling increasingly unnerved by McCaughey&#039;s failure to quickly find and read the passages she espoused to be an expert about. I kept thinking if it&#039;s so black and white, why doesn&#039;t she just read the passage?  The passage that she pointed to and which Stewart finally read had little to do with her argument, so she backed down claiming that the language was not clear in the bill. 

I found that this argument about the bill language being unclear is being used by anti-abortionists to oppose the bill. They claim --rightfully so--that the bill does not prohibit federal funds from being used for abortions. In essence, just as the passage of the federal budget gets held over each fall over abortion rights, so now has the health reform legislation boiled down to whether one is  anti-abortion.  Better to let the millions of uninsured suffer or die, then to fathom the thought that one of the private insurance company plans would cover an abortion.  This is already the insurance company&#039;s choice today. I guess the difference is that, with reform, the government would be subsidizing more private insurance plans.

As a salesperson, sometimes you have to know what the objection is in order to overcome it and make the sale.  I think those in favor of the bill need to let the opposition talk long enough in order to get a real handle on their objections as Stewart did. Then those in favor of the bill need to come up with a crib sheet of specific ways to overcome these objections, and get that sheet out to the public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very insightful. I watched the interview on The Daily Show and found myself feeling increasingly unnerved by McCaughey&#8217;s failure to quickly find and read the passages she espoused to be an expert about. I kept thinking if it&#8217;s so black and white, why doesn&#8217;t she just read the passage?  The passage that she pointed to and which Stewart finally read had little to do with her argument, so she backed down claiming that the language was not clear in the bill. </p>
<p>I found that this argument about the bill language being unclear is being used by anti-abortionists to oppose the bill. They claim &#8211;rightfully so&#8211;that the bill does not prohibit federal funds from being used for abortions. In essence, just as the passage of the federal budget gets held over each fall over abortion rights, so now has the health reform legislation boiled down to whether one is  anti-abortion.  Better to let the millions of uninsured suffer or die, then to fathom the thought that one of the private insurance company plans would cover an abortion.  This is already the insurance company&#8217;s choice today. I guess the difference is that, with reform, the government would be subsidizing more private insurance plans.</p>
<p>As a salesperson, sometimes you have to know what the objection is in order to overcome it and make the sale.  I think those in favor of the bill need to let the opposition talk long enough in order to get a real handle on their objections as Stewart did. Then those in favor of the bill need to come up with a crib sheet of specific ways to overcome these objections, and get that sheet out to the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Read Without Reading by joy</title>
		<link>http://silentspeaking.wordpress.com/2009/08/24/how-to-read-without-reading/#comment-1245</link>
		<dc:creator>joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silentspeaking.wordpress.com/?p=1371#comment-1245</guid>
		<description>great critique, dittos all around! ;D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great critique, dittos all around! ;D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Read Without Reading by David Carrigan</title>
		<link>http://silentspeaking.wordpress.com/2009/08/24/how-to-read-without-reading/#comment-1244</link>
		<dc:creator>David Carrigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silentspeaking.wordpress.com/?p=1371#comment-1244</guid>
		<description>Thanks for putting me onto the RM show. I&#039;m also going to check out that interview. Sounds hilarious and infuriating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for putting me onto the RM show. I&#8217;m also going to check out that interview. Sounds hilarious and infuriating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s &#8220;Free&#8221; Got To Do With It? by tammy</title>
		<link>http://silentspeaking.wordpress.com/2009/08/12/whats-free-got-to-do-with-it/#comment-1241</link>
		<dc:creator>tammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 03:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silentspeaking.wordpress.com/?p=1217#comment-1241</guid>
		<description>wow.  well said!  esp your descriptions of &quot;privatized socialism&quot; and the vicious cycle of &quot;free-market&quot; politicians.  

to your main point: with all of the advances that we enjoy as a nation, it&#039;s mostly just saddening to me that we as a society haven&#039;t agreed with the rest of the industrialized world that the health of our own citizens is valuable enough to guarantee its protection. and it&#039;s embarrassing that we seem to value our individual pocketbooks more than our own lives.

to your closing remarks: thank you! again, well said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow.  well said!  esp your descriptions of &#8220;privatized socialism&#8221; and the vicious cycle of &#8220;free-market&#8221; politicians.  </p>
<p>to your main point: with all of the advances that we enjoy as a nation, it&#8217;s mostly just saddening to me that we as a society haven&#8217;t agreed with the rest of the industrialized world that the health of our own citizens is valuable enough to guarantee its protection. and it&#8217;s embarrassing that we seem to value our individual pocketbooks more than our own lives.</p>
<p>to your closing remarks: thank you! again, well said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The &#8220;Big Government&#8221; of the Constitution by tammy</title>
		<link>http://silentspeaking.wordpress.com/2009/07/25/the-big-government-of-the-constitution/#comment-1227</link>
		<dc:creator>tammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 17:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silentspeaking.wordpress.com/?p=1135#comment-1227</guid>
		<description>oh my head, that levin quote is awful!

well said -- great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh my head, that levin quote is awful!</p>
<p>well said &#8212; great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on National Revision by Joshua</title>
		<link>http://silentspeaking.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/national-revision/#comment-1222</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silentspeaking.wordpress.com/?p=1016#comment-1222</guid>
		<description>As much as I appreciate and welcome comments, I fail to see how a deluge of quotes ripped straight from some right wing web sites is a substantive response to this post (assuming it was meant to be).

Race and racism clearly have been a pervasive, long evolving part of U.S. history, across the spectrum. Playing the political party blame game is fairly easy to do, and it can easily become divisive and misleading without historical context and nuance (which was part of my point). With a little effort, I too could produce a list of racist quotes from Republicans, conservatives, and GOP mouthpieces. A few examples: 

There&#039;s Rush Limbaugh, who was all too fond of playing the &quot;Barack the Magic Negro&quot; song and said &quot;we are being told that we have to hope he succeeds, that we have to bend over, grab the ankles, bend over forward, backward, whichever, because his father is black, because this is the first black president.&quot;

Or how about the amazingly xenophobic, Pat Buchanan, who proudly said 108 of the 110 Supreme Court Justices have been white because, &quot;White men were 100% of the people that wrote the Constitution, 100% of the people that signed the Declaration of Independence, 100% of the people who died at Gettysburg and Vicksburg, probably close to 100% of the people who died at Normandy. This has been a country built basically by white folks...&quot;

Or how about Bill O&#039;reilly to John McCain, &quot;But do you understand what the New York Times wants, and the far-left want? They want to break down the white, Christian, male power structure, which you’re a part, and so am I, and they want to bring in millions of foreign nationals to basically break down the structure that we have. So I say you’ve got to cap [immigration] with a number.&quot;

Or even President Lincoln, the &quot;Great Emancipator&quot; himself, said, &quot;there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I...am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.&quot;

The list could go on, but this all misses the point. The point was not to suggest that there aren&#039;t or have not been Democrats who are racist nor was the point to engage in the common game of manipulating a party&#039;s historical record and transferring it straight to the present (as though the parties haven&#039;t changed at all) to claim one party is or isn&#039;t the party of racism. 

The point was, upon looking closer, it seems the political parties, labels, and agendas have changed over time as the political climate has changed, while, however, there are dominant ideologies - e.g. &quot;conservatism&quot; and &quot;liberalism&quot; - running beneath all this that maintain continuity in direction and attitude over time and have arguably been a driving force in political party demographic shifts as a result - thus the shift in Southern national politics from the white conservative Democratic dominance to a white conservative Republican dominance in the wake of Civil Rights legislation passed under a Democratic President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I appreciate and welcome comments, I fail to see how a deluge of quotes ripped straight from some right wing web sites is a substantive response to this post (assuming it was meant to be).</p>
<p>Race and racism clearly have been a pervasive, long evolving part of U.S. history, across the spectrum. Playing the political party blame game is fairly easy to do, and it can easily become divisive and misleading without historical context and nuance (which was part of my point). With a little effort, I too could produce a list of racist quotes from Republicans, conservatives, and GOP mouthpieces. A few examples: </p>
<p>There&#8217;s Rush Limbaugh, who was all too fond of playing the &#8220;Barack the Magic Negro&#8221; song and said &#8220;we are being told that we have to hope he succeeds, that we have to bend over, grab the ankles, bend over forward, backward, whichever, because his father is black, because this is the first black president.&#8221;</p>
<p>Or how about the amazingly xenophobic, Pat Buchanan, who proudly said 108 of the 110 Supreme Court Justices have been white because, &#8220;White men were 100% of the people that wrote the Constitution, 100% of the people that signed the Declaration of Independence, 100% of the people who died at Gettysburg and Vicksburg, probably close to 100% of the people who died at Normandy. This has been a country built basically by white folks&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Or how about Bill O&#8217;reilly to John McCain, &#8220;But do you understand what the New York Times wants, and the far-left want? They want to break down the white, Christian, male power structure, which you’re a part, and so am I, and they want to bring in millions of foreign nationals to basically break down the structure that we have. So I say you’ve got to cap [immigration] with a number.&#8221;</p>
<p>Or even President Lincoln, the &#8220;Great Emancipator&#8221; himself, said, &#8220;there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I&#8230;am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.&#8221;</p>
<p>The list could go on, but this all misses the point. The point was not to suggest that there aren&#8217;t or have not been Democrats who are racist nor was the point to engage in the common game of manipulating a party&#8217;s historical record and transferring it straight to the present (as though the parties haven&#8217;t changed at all) to claim one party is or isn&#8217;t the party of racism. </p>
<p>The point was, upon looking closer, it seems the political parties, labels, and agendas have changed over time as the political climate has changed, while, however, there are dominant ideologies &#8211; e.g. &#8220;conservatism&#8221; and &#8220;liberalism&#8221; &#8211; running beneath all this that maintain continuity in direction and attitude over time and have arguably been a driving force in political party demographic shifts as a result &#8211; thus the shift in Southern national politics from the white conservative Democratic dominance to a white conservative Republican dominance in the wake of Civil Rights legislation passed under a Democratic President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on National Revision by Mark Boabaca</title>
		<link>http://silentspeaking.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/national-revision/#comment-1220</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Boabaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 06:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silentspeaking.wordpress.com/?p=1016#comment-1220</guid>
		<description>[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaRZXzvZtK8&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://silentspeaking.wordpress.com/2009/09/03/mediscare/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/GaRZXzvZtK8/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on National Revision by Mark Boabaca</title>
		<link>http://silentspeaking.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/national-revision/#comment-1219</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Boabaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 06:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silentspeaking.wordpress.com/?p=1016#comment-1219</guid>
		<description>&quot;Great Moments in Democrat Racist History&quot;: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaRZXzvZtK8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Great Moments in Democrat Racist History&#8221;: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaRZXzvZtK8" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaRZXzvZtK8</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on National Revision by Mark Boabaca</title>
		<link>http://silentspeaking.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/national-revision/#comment-1218</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Boabaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 06:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silentspeaking.wordpress.com/?p=1016#comment-1218</guid>
		<description>Good stuff:

I hold that the present state of civilization, where two races of different origin, and distinguished by color, and other physical differences, as well as intellectual, are brought together, the relation now existing in the slaveholding states between the two, is, instead of an evil, a good--a positive good.&quot;

--Sen. John C. Calhoun (D., S.C.), 1837
Vice President, 1825-32
His statue stands in the U.S. Capitol.
If blacks were given the right to vote, that would &quot;place every splay-footed, bandy-shanked, hump-backed, thick-lipped, flat-nosed, woolly-headed, ebon-colored Negro in the country upon an equality with the poor white man.&quot;

--Rep. Andrew Johnson, (D., Tenn.), 1844
President, 1865-69
&quot;Resolved, That the Democratic Party will resist all attempts at renewing, in Congress or out of it, the agitation of the slavery question, under whatever shape or color the attempt may be made.&quot;

--Platform of the Democratic Party, 1852
Blacks are &quot;a subordinate and inferior class of beings who had been subjugated by the dominant race.&quot;

--Chief Justice Roger Taney, Dred Scott v. Sandford, 1856
Appointed Attorney General by Andrew Jackson in 1831
Appointed Secretary of the Treasury by Andrew Jackson in 1833
Appointed to the Supreme Court by Andrew Jackson in 1836
&quot;Resolved, That claiming fellowship with, and desiring the co-operation of all who regard the preservation of the Union under the Constitution as the paramount issue--and repudiating all sectional parties and platforms concerning domestic slavery, which seek to embroil the States and incite to treason and armed resistance to law in the Territories; and whose avowed purposes, if consummated, must end in civil war and disunion, the American Democracy recognize and adopt the principles contained in the organic laws establishing the Territories of Kansas and Nebraska as embodying the only sound and safe solution of the &#039;slavery question&#039; upon which the great national idea of the people of this whole country can repose in its determined conservatism of the Union--NON-INTERFERENCE BY CONGRESS WITH SLAVERY IN STATE AND TERRITORY, OR IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA&quot; (emphasis in original).

--Platform of the Democratic Party, 1856
&quot;I hold that a Negro is not and never ought to be a citizen of the United States. I hold that this government was made on the white basis; made by the white men, for the benefit of white men and their posterity forever, and should be administered by white men and none others.&quot;

--Sen. Stephen A. Douglas (D., Ill.), 1858
Presidential nominee of the Democratic Party, 1860
&quot;Resolved, That the enactments of the State Legislatures to defeat the faithful execution of the Fugitive Slave Law, are hostile in character, subversive of the Constitution, and revolutionary in their effect.&quot;

--Platform of the Democratic Party, 1860
&quot;The Almighty has fixed the distinction of the races; the Almighty has made the black man inferior, and, sir, by no legislation, by no military power, can you wipe out this distinction.&quot;

--Rep. Fernando Wood (D., N.Y.), 1865
Mayor of New York City, 1855-58, 1860-62
&quot;My fellow citizens, I have said that the contest before us was one for the restoration of our government; it is also one for the restoration of our race. It is to prevent the people of our race from being exiled from their homes--exiled from the government which they formed and created for themselves and for their children, and to prevent them from being driven out of the country or trodden under foot by an inferior and barbarous race.&quot;

--Francis P. Blair Jr., accepting the Democratic nomination for Vice President, 1868
Democratic Senator from Missouri, 1869-72His statue stands in the U.S. Capitol.
&quot;Instead of restoring the Union, it [the Republican Party] has, so far as in its power, dissolved it, and subjected ten states, in time of profound peace, to military despotism and Negro supremacy.&quot;

--Platform of the Democratic Party, 1868
&quot;While the tendency of the white race is upward, the tendency of the colored race is downward.&quot;

--Sen. Thomas Hendricks (D., Ind.), 1869
Democratic nominee for Vice President, 1876
Vice President, 1885
&quot;We, the delegates of the Democratic party of the United States . . . demand such modification of the treaty with the Chinese Empire, or such legislation within constitutional limitations, as shall prevent further importation or immigration of the Mongolian race.&quot;

--Platform of the Democratic Party, 1876
&quot;No more Chinese immigration, except for travel, education, and foreign commerce, and that even carefully guarded.&quot;

--Platform of the Democratic Party, 1880
&quot;American civilization demands that against the immigration or importation of Mongolians to these shores our gates be closed.&quot;

--Platform of the Democratic Party, 1884
&quot;We favor the continuance and strict enforcement of the Chinese exclusion law, and its application to the same classes of all Asiatic races.&quot;

--Platform of the Democratic Party, 1900
&quot;The repeal of the fifteenth amendment, one of the greatest blunders and therefore one of the greatest crimes in political history, is a consummation to be devoutly wished for.&quot;

--Rep. John Sharpe Williams (D., Miss.), 1903
House Minority Leader, 1903-08
&quot;Republicanism means Negro equality, while the Democratic Party means that the white man is supreme. That is why we Southerners are all Democrats.&quot;

--Sen. Ben Tillman (D., S.C.), 1906
Chairman, Committee on Naval Affairs, 1913-19
&quot;We are opposed to the admission of Asiatic immigrants who can not be amalgamated with our population, or whose presence among us would raise a race issue and involve us in diplomatic controversies with Oriental powers.&quot;

--Platform of the Democratic Party, 1908
&quot;I am opposed to the practice of having colored policemen in the District [of Columbia]. It is a source of danger by constantly engendering racial friction, and is offensive to thousands of Southern white people who make their homes here.&quot;

--Sen. Hoke Smith (D., Ga.), 1912
Appointed Secretary of the Interior by Grover Cleveland in 1893
&quot;The South is serious with regard to its attitude to the Negro in politics. The South understands this subject, and its policy is unalterable and uncompromising. We desire no concessions. We seek no sops. We grasp no shadows on this subject. We take no risks. We abhor a Northern policy of catering to the Negro in politics just as we abhor a Northern policy of social equality.&quot;

--Josephus Daniels, editor, Raleigh News &amp; Observer, 1912
Appointed Secretary of the Navy by Woodrow Wilson in 1913
Appointed Ambassador to Mexico by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933
USS Josephus Daniels named for him by the Johnson Administration in 1965
&quot;The Negro as a race, in all the ages of the world, has never shown sustained power of self-development. He is not endowed with the creative faculty. . . . He has never created for himself any civilization. . . . He has never had any civilization except that which has been inculcated by a superior race. And it is a lamentable fact that his civilization lasts only so long as he is in the hands of the white man who inculcates it. When left to himself he has universally gone back to the barbarism of the jungle.&quot;

--Sen. James Vardaman (D., Miss.), 1914
Chairman, Committee on Natural Resources, 1913-19
&quot;This is a white man&#039;s country, and will always remain a white man&#039;s country.&quot;

--Rep. James F. Byrnes (D., S.C.), 1919
Appointed to the Supreme Court by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1941
Appointed Secretary of State by Harry S. Truman in 1945
&quot;Slavery among the whites was an improvement over independence in Africa. The very progress that the blacks have made, when--and only when--brought into contact with the whites, ought to be a sufficient argument in support of white supremacy--it ought to be sufficient to convince even the blacks themselves.&quot;

--William Jennings Bryan, 1923
Presidential nominee of the Democratic Party, 1896, 1900 and 1908
Appointed Secretary of State by Woodrow Wilson in 1913
His statue stands in the U.S. Capitol.
&quot;Anyone who has traveled to the Far East knows that the mingling of Asiatic blood with European or American blood produces, in nine cases out of ten, the most unfortunate results. . . . The argument works both ways. I know a great many cultivated, highly educated and delightful Japanese. They have all told me that they would feel the same repugnance and objection to have thousands of Americans settle in Japan and intermarry with the Japanese as I would feel in having large numbers of Japanese coming over here and intermarry with the American population. In this question, then, of Japanese exclusion from the United States it is necessary only to advance the true reason--the undesirability of mixing the blood of the two peoples. . . . The Japanese people and the American people are both opposed to intermarriage of the two races--there can be no quarrel there.&quot;

--Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1925
President, 1933-45
&quot;This passport which you have given me is a symbol to me of the passport which you have given me before. I do not feel that it would be out of place to state to you here on this occasion that I know that without the support of the members of this organization I would not have been called, even by my enemies, the &#039;Junior Senator from Alabama.&#039; &quot;

--Hugo Black, accepting a life membership in the Ku Klux Klan upon his election to the U.S. Senate as a Democrat from Alabama, 1926
Appointed to the Supreme Court by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1937
&quot;Mr. President, the crime of lynching . . . is not of sufficient importance to justify this legislation.&quot;

--Sen. Claude Pepper (D., Fla.), 1938
Spoken while engaged in a six-hour speech against the antilynching bill
&quot;I am a former Kleagle [recruiter] of the Ku Klux Klan in Raleigh County. . . . The Klan is needed today as never before and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia. It is necessary that the order be promoted immediately and in every state in the union.&quot;

--Robert C. Byrd, 1946
Democratic Senator from West Virginia, 1959-present
Senate Majority Leader, 1977-80 and 1987-88
Senate President Pro Tempore, 1989-95, 2001-03, 2007-present
His portrait stands in the U.S. Capitol.
President Truman&#039;s civil rights program &quot;is a farce and a sham--an effort to set up a police state in the guise of liberty. I am opposed to that program. I have voted against the so-called poll tax repeal bill. . .. I have voted against the so-called anti-lynching bill.&quot;

--Rep. Lyndon B. Johnson (D., Texas), 1948
U.S. Senator, 1949-61
Senate Majority Leader, 1955-61
President, 1963-69
&quot;There is no warrant for the curious notion that Christianity favors the involuntary commingling of the races in social institutions. Although He knew both Jews and Samaritans and the relations existing between them, Christ did not advocate that courts or legislative bodies should compel them to mix socially against their will.&quot;

--Sen. Sam Ervin (D., N.C.), 1955
Chairman, Committee on Government Operations, 1971-75
&quot;The decline and fall of the Roman empire came after years of intermarriage with other races. Spain was toppled as a world power as a result of the amalgamation of the races. . . . Certainly history shows that nations composed of a mongrel race lose their strength and become weak, lazy and indifferent.&quot;

--Herman E. Talmadge, 1955
Democratic Senator from Georgia, 1957-81
Chairman, Committee on Agriculture, 1971-81
&quot;These Negroes, they&#039;re getting pretty uppity these days and that&#039;s a problem for us since they&#039;ve got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we&#039;ve got to do something about this, we&#039;ve got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference. For if we don&#039;t move at all, then their allies will line up against us and there&#039;ll be no way of stopping them, we&#039;ll lose the filibuster and there&#039;ll be no way of putting a brake on all sorts of wild legislation. It&#039;ll be Reconstruction all over again.&quot;

--Sen. Lyndon B. Johnson (D., Texas), 1957
&quot;I have never seen very many white people who felt they were being imposed upon or being subjected to any second-class citizenship if they were directed to a waiting room or to any other public facility to wait or to eat with other white people. Only the Negroes, of all the races which are in this land, publicly proclaim they are being mistreated, imposed upon, and declared second-class citizens because they must go to public facilities with members of their own race.&quot;

--Sen. Richard B. Russell Jr. (D., Ga.), 1961
The Russell Senate Office Building is named for him.
&quot;I did not lie awake at night worrying about the problems of Negroes.&quot;

--Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, 1961
Kennedy later authorized wiretapping the phones and bugging the hotel rooms of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
&quot;I&#039;m not going to use the federal government&#039;s authority deliberately to circumvent the natural inclination of people to live in ethnically homogeneous neighborhoods. . . . I have nothing against a community that&#039;s made up of people who are Polish or Czechoslovakian or French-Canadian or blacks who are trying to maintain the ethnic purity of their neighborhoods.&quot;

--Jimmy Carter, 1976
President, 1977-81
Winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, 2002

&quot;The Confederate Memorial has had a special place in my life for many years. . . . There were many, many times that I found myself drawn to this deeply inspiring memorial, to contemplate the sacrifices of others, several of whom were my ancestors, whose enormous suffering and collective gallantry are to this day still misunderstood by most Americans.&quot;

--James Webb, 1990
Now a Democratic Senator from Virginia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff:</p>
<p>I hold that the present state of civilization, where two races of different origin, and distinguished by color, and other physical differences, as well as intellectual, are brought together, the relation now existing in the slaveholding states between the two, is, instead of an evil, a good&#8211;a positive good.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Sen. John C. Calhoun (D., S.C.), 1837<br />
Vice President, 1825-32<br />
His statue stands in the U.S. Capitol.<br />
If blacks were given the right to vote, that would &#8220;place every splay-footed, bandy-shanked, hump-backed, thick-lipped, flat-nosed, woolly-headed, ebon-colored Negro in the country upon an equality with the poor white man.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Rep. Andrew Johnson, (D., Tenn.), 1844<br />
President, 1865-69<br />
&#8220;Resolved, That the Democratic Party will resist all attempts at renewing, in Congress or out of it, the agitation of the slavery question, under whatever shape or color the attempt may be made.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Platform of the Democratic Party, 1852<br />
Blacks are &#8220;a subordinate and inferior class of beings who had been subjugated by the dominant race.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Chief Justice Roger Taney, Dred Scott v. Sandford, 1856<br />
Appointed Attorney General by Andrew Jackson in 1831<br />
Appointed Secretary of the Treasury by Andrew Jackson in 1833<br />
Appointed to the Supreme Court by Andrew Jackson in 1836<br />
&#8220;Resolved, That claiming fellowship with, and desiring the co-operation of all who regard the preservation of the Union under the Constitution as the paramount issue&#8211;and repudiating all sectional parties and platforms concerning domestic slavery, which seek to embroil the States and incite to treason and armed resistance to law in the Territories; and whose avowed purposes, if consummated, must end in civil war and disunion, the American Democracy recognize and adopt the principles contained in the organic laws establishing the Territories of Kansas and Nebraska as embodying the only sound and safe solution of the &#8217;slavery question&#8217; upon which the great national idea of the people of this whole country can repose in its determined conservatism of the Union&#8211;NON-INTERFERENCE BY CONGRESS WITH SLAVERY IN STATE AND TERRITORY, OR IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA&#8221; (emphasis in original).</p>
<p>&#8211;Platform of the Democratic Party, 1856<br />
&#8220;I hold that a Negro is not and never ought to be a citizen of the United States. I hold that this government was made on the white basis; made by the white men, for the benefit of white men and their posterity forever, and should be administered by white men and none others.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Sen. Stephen A. Douglas (D., Ill.), 1858<br />
Presidential nominee of the Democratic Party, 1860<br />
&#8220;Resolved, That the enactments of the State Legislatures to defeat the faithful execution of the Fugitive Slave Law, are hostile in character, subversive of the Constitution, and revolutionary in their effect.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Platform of the Democratic Party, 1860<br />
&#8220;The Almighty has fixed the distinction of the races; the Almighty has made the black man inferior, and, sir, by no legislation, by no military power, can you wipe out this distinction.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Rep. Fernando Wood (D., N.Y.), 1865<br />
Mayor of New York City, 1855-58, 1860-62<br />
&#8220;My fellow citizens, I have said that the contest before us was one for the restoration of our government; it is also one for the restoration of our race. It is to prevent the people of our race from being exiled from their homes&#8211;exiled from the government which they formed and created for themselves and for their children, and to prevent them from being driven out of the country or trodden under foot by an inferior and barbarous race.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Francis P. Blair Jr., accepting the Democratic nomination for Vice President, 1868<br />
Democratic Senator from Missouri, 1869-72His statue stands in the U.S. Capitol.<br />
&#8220;Instead of restoring the Union, it [the Republican Party] has, so far as in its power, dissolved it, and subjected ten states, in time of profound peace, to military despotism and Negro supremacy.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Platform of the Democratic Party, 1868<br />
&#8220;While the tendency of the white race is upward, the tendency of the colored race is downward.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Sen. Thomas Hendricks (D., Ind.), 1869<br />
Democratic nominee for Vice President, 1876<br />
Vice President, 1885<br />
&#8220;We, the delegates of the Democratic party of the United States . . . demand such modification of the treaty with the Chinese Empire, or such legislation within constitutional limitations, as shall prevent further importation or immigration of the Mongolian race.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Platform of the Democratic Party, 1876<br />
&#8220;No more Chinese immigration, except for travel, education, and foreign commerce, and that even carefully guarded.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Platform of the Democratic Party, 1880<br />
&#8220;American civilization demands that against the immigration or importation of Mongolians to these shores our gates be closed.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Platform of the Democratic Party, 1884<br />
&#8220;We favor the continuance and strict enforcement of the Chinese exclusion law, and its application to the same classes of all Asiatic races.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Platform of the Democratic Party, 1900<br />
&#8220;The repeal of the fifteenth amendment, one of the greatest blunders and therefore one of the greatest crimes in political history, is a consummation to be devoutly wished for.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Rep. John Sharpe Williams (D., Miss.), 1903<br />
House Minority Leader, 1903-08<br />
&#8220;Republicanism means Negro equality, while the Democratic Party means that the white man is supreme. That is why we Southerners are all Democrats.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Sen. Ben Tillman (D., S.C.), 1906<br />
Chairman, Committee on Naval Affairs, 1913-19<br />
&#8220;We are opposed to the admission of Asiatic immigrants who can not be amalgamated with our population, or whose presence among us would raise a race issue and involve us in diplomatic controversies with Oriental powers.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Platform of the Democratic Party, 1908<br />
&#8220;I am opposed to the practice of having colored policemen in the District [of Columbia]. It is a source of danger by constantly engendering racial friction, and is offensive to thousands of Southern white people who make their homes here.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Sen. Hoke Smith (D., Ga.), 1912<br />
Appointed Secretary of the Interior by Grover Cleveland in 1893<br />
&#8220;The South is serious with regard to its attitude to the Negro in politics. The South understands this subject, and its policy is unalterable and uncompromising. We desire no concessions. We seek no sops. We grasp no shadows on this subject. We take no risks. We abhor a Northern policy of catering to the Negro in politics just as we abhor a Northern policy of social equality.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Josephus Daniels, editor, Raleigh News &amp; Observer, 1912<br />
Appointed Secretary of the Navy by Woodrow Wilson in 1913<br />
Appointed Ambassador to Mexico by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933<br />
USS Josephus Daniels named for him by the Johnson Administration in 1965<br />
&#8220;The Negro as a race, in all the ages of the world, has never shown sustained power of self-development. He is not endowed with the creative faculty. . . . He has never created for himself any civilization. . . . He has never had any civilization except that which has been inculcated by a superior race. And it is a lamentable fact that his civilization lasts only so long as he is in the hands of the white man who inculcates it. When left to himself he has universally gone back to the barbarism of the jungle.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Sen. James Vardaman (D., Miss.), 1914<br />
Chairman, Committee on Natural Resources, 1913-19<br />
&#8220;This is a white man&#8217;s country, and will always remain a white man&#8217;s country.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Rep. James F. Byrnes (D., S.C.), 1919<br />
Appointed to the Supreme Court by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1941<br />
Appointed Secretary of State by Harry S. Truman in 1945<br />
&#8220;Slavery among the whites was an improvement over independence in Africa. The very progress that the blacks have made, when&#8211;and only when&#8211;brought into contact with the whites, ought to be a sufficient argument in support of white supremacy&#8211;it ought to be sufficient to convince even the blacks themselves.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;William Jennings Bryan, 1923<br />
Presidential nominee of the Democratic Party, 1896, 1900 and 1908<br />
Appointed Secretary of State by Woodrow Wilson in 1913<br />
His statue stands in the U.S. Capitol.<br />
&#8220;Anyone who has traveled to the Far East knows that the mingling of Asiatic blood with European or American blood produces, in nine cases out of ten, the most unfortunate results. . . . The argument works both ways. I know a great many cultivated, highly educated and delightful Japanese. They have all told me that they would feel the same repugnance and objection to have thousands of Americans settle in Japan and intermarry with the Japanese as I would feel in having large numbers of Japanese coming over here and intermarry with the American population. In this question, then, of Japanese exclusion from the United States it is necessary only to advance the true reason&#8211;the undesirability of mixing the blood of the two peoples. . . . The Japanese people and the American people are both opposed to intermarriage of the two races&#8211;there can be no quarrel there.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1925<br />
President, 1933-45<br />
&#8220;This passport which you have given me is a symbol to me of the passport which you have given me before. I do not feel that it would be out of place to state to you here on this occasion that I know that without the support of the members of this organization I would not have been called, even by my enemies, the &#8216;Junior Senator from Alabama.&#8217; &#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Hugo Black, accepting a life membership in the Ku Klux Klan upon his election to the U.S. Senate as a Democrat from Alabama, 1926<br />
Appointed to the Supreme Court by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1937<br />
&#8220;Mr. President, the crime of lynching . . . is not of sufficient importance to justify this legislation.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Sen. Claude Pepper (D., Fla.), 1938<br />
Spoken while engaged in a six-hour speech against the antilynching bill<br />
&#8220;I am a former Kleagle [recruiter] of the Ku Klux Klan in Raleigh County. . . . The Klan is needed today as never before and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia. It is necessary that the order be promoted immediately and in every state in the union.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Robert C. Byrd, 1946<br />
Democratic Senator from West Virginia, 1959-present<br />
Senate Majority Leader, 1977-80 and 1987-88<br />
Senate President Pro Tempore, 1989-95, 2001-03, 2007-present<br />
His portrait stands in the U.S. Capitol.<br />
President Truman&#8217;s civil rights program &#8220;is a farce and a sham&#8211;an effort to set up a police state in the guise of liberty. I am opposed to that program. I have voted against the so-called poll tax repeal bill. . .. I have voted against the so-called anti-lynching bill.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Rep. Lyndon B. Johnson (D., Texas), 1948<br />
U.S. Senator, 1949-61<br />
Senate Majority Leader, 1955-61<br />
President, 1963-69<br />
&#8220;There is no warrant for the curious notion that Christianity favors the involuntary commingling of the races in social institutions. Although He knew both Jews and Samaritans and the relations existing between them, Christ did not advocate that courts or legislative bodies should compel them to mix socially against their will.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Sen. Sam Ervin (D., N.C.), 1955<br />
Chairman, Committee on Government Operations, 1971-75<br />
&#8220;The decline and fall of the Roman empire came after years of intermarriage with other races. Spain was toppled as a world power as a result of the amalgamation of the races. . . . Certainly history shows that nations composed of a mongrel race lose their strength and become weak, lazy and indifferent.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Herman E. Talmadge, 1955<br />
Democratic Senator from Georgia, 1957-81<br />
Chairman, Committee on Agriculture, 1971-81<br />
&#8220;These Negroes, they&#8217;re getting pretty uppity these days and that&#8217;s a problem for us since they&#8217;ve got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we&#8217;ve got to do something about this, we&#8217;ve got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference. For if we don&#8217;t move at all, then their allies will line up against us and there&#8217;ll be no way of stopping them, we&#8217;ll lose the filibuster and there&#8217;ll be no way of putting a brake on all sorts of wild legislation. It&#8217;ll be Reconstruction all over again.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Sen. Lyndon B. Johnson (D., Texas), 1957<br />
&#8220;I have never seen very many white people who felt they were being imposed upon or being subjected to any second-class citizenship if they were directed to a waiting room or to any other public facility to wait or to eat with other white people. Only the Negroes, of all the races which are in this land, publicly proclaim they are being mistreated, imposed upon, and declared second-class citizens because they must go to public facilities with members of their own race.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Sen. Richard B. Russell Jr. (D., Ga.), 1961<br />
The Russell Senate Office Building is named for him.<br />
&#8220;I did not lie awake at night worrying about the problems of Negroes.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, 1961<br />
Kennedy later authorized wiretapping the phones and bugging the hotel rooms of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.<br />
&#8220;I&#8217;m not going to use the federal government&#8217;s authority deliberately to circumvent the natural inclination of people to live in ethnically homogeneous neighborhoods. . . . I have nothing against a community that&#8217;s made up of people who are Polish or Czechoslovakian or French-Canadian or blacks who are trying to maintain the ethnic purity of their neighborhoods.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Jimmy Carter, 1976<br />
President, 1977-81<br />
Winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, 2002</p>
<p>&#8220;The Confederate Memorial has had a special place in my life for many years. . . . There were many, many times that I found myself drawn to this deeply inspiring memorial, to contemplate the sacrifices of others, several of whom were my ancestors, whose enormous suffering and collective gallantry are to this day still misunderstood by most Americans.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;James Webb, 1990<br />
Now a Democratic Senator from Virginia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
